Best Meta Ads Account Structure for Local Business Lead Generation in 2025
Best Meta Ads Account Structure for Local Business Lead Generation in 2025
Written by

Gunnar Borchardt
5 min read
5 min read
5 min read



The Facebook ads community has been locked in an ongoing debate for years: what's the optimal campaign account structure for maximum results?
In one corner, we have the "micromanagers" – advertisers who build elaborate structures with multiple campaigns and numerous ad sets, believing that granular control translates to higher ROAS.
In the opposing corner stand the "consolidators" – those who follow Meta's push toward simplified campaign structures that give the algorithm room to work its magic.
So which approach actually delivers better results for local businesses looking to generate quality leads in 2025? In this post, we'll cut through the noise, examine what Meta officially recommends, and reveal the real-world results my agency has consistently achieved through extensive split testing with local business clients.
The answer might surprise you – and potentially transform your local lead generation strategy for good.
The Facebook ads community has been locked in an ongoing debate for years: what's the optimal campaign account structure for maximum results?
In one corner, we have the "micromanagers" – advertisers who build elaborate structures with multiple campaigns and numerous ad sets, believing that granular control translates to higher ROAS.
In the opposing corner stand the "consolidators" – those who follow Meta's push toward simplified campaign structures that give the algorithm room to work its magic.
So which approach actually delivers better results for local businesses looking to generate quality leads in 2025? In this post, we'll cut through the noise, examine what Meta officially recommends, and reveal the real-world results my agency has consistently achieved through extensive split testing with local business clients.
The answer might surprise you – and potentially transform your local lead generation strategy for good.
The Facebook ads community has been locked in an ongoing debate for years: what's the optimal campaign account structure for maximum results?
In one corner, we have the "micromanagers" – advertisers who build elaborate structures with multiple campaigns and numerous ad sets, believing that granular control translates to higher ROAS.
In the opposing corner stand the "consolidators" – those who follow Meta's push toward simplified campaign structures that give the algorithm room to work its magic.
So which approach actually delivers better results for local businesses looking to generate quality leads in 2025? In this post, we'll cut through the noise, examine what Meta officially recommends, and reveal the real-world results my agency has consistently achieved through extensive split testing with local business clients.
The answer might surprise you – and potentially transform your local lead generation strategy for good.
In this post:
In this post:
In this post:
Section
Section
Section
The "Micromanager" Account Structure Breakdown

So what does a micromanager account structure actually look like?
Typically, you'd see:
Separate campaigns for awareness, consideration, and conversion
Multiple ad sets divided by audience types
Different ad sets for retargeting, lookalikes, and cold traffic
Location-specific ad sets within your service area
Separate budgets for each segment
Many advertisers still swear by this approach. They like seeing exactly which audiences perform best and being able to control everything manually.
But here's the problem - this approach made sense in 2020, not in 2025.
What Meta Actually Recommends

Meta has been pushing for simpler campaign structures through their Advantage+ campaigns and automated features.
Meta has been crystal clear about their direction in recent years. Their official guidance pushes for simpler structures that let their AI do the heavy lifting.
From Meta's ad set structure guide:
"When you run similar ad sets at the same time, each one gets fewer opportunities to learn, and fewer results. Combining ad sets will help you get the results you need faster, and see stable results sooner."
Meta specifically recommends:
Use fewer campaigns and ad sets: Consolidate to 1 campaign per objective with fewer ad sets
Broaden targeting: Remove unnecessary targeting restrictions to help the algorithm find the best audiences
Consolidate similar audiences: Stop splitting your budget across multiple similar audience segments
Meta has seen impressive results from businesses that implement simplified structures. According to Meta's Ad Set Structure Guide:
"Women's accessories brand Lele Sadoughi saw a +41% jump in conversions when they tested a simplified ad account structure."
This real-world example demonstrates exactly what my agency has been seeing with our local business clients - consolidation works.
As Meta puts it in their Business Help Center:
"Our ad delivery system works best when your audience size is between 2 to 10 million people. With a bigger audience, the auction will have greater opportunities to deliver ads, observe outcomes and optimize."
Basically, Meta is saying: "Trust our algorithm, it knows what it's doing."
What My Agency Found With Real Local Clients

We tested this ourselves with a hair restoration clinic in Scottsdale.
Our initial setup followed the traditional approach:
A retargeting ad set
A lookalike ad set
A prospecting ad set
Various test ad sets
This worked fine at first. But we kept hitting the same wall - retargeting and lookalike audiences would eventually fatigue, and performance would drop.
So we tried what Meta suggested, but took it even further:
One campaign
One broad ad set
About 50 diverse ads (not just the 3-6 Meta recommends)
The results? Way more stability, lower cost per lead, and ability to scale without performance tanking. Plus, we spent way less time managing campaigns and more time on creating better ads.
"But How Do You Test With Just One Campaign?"

This is the question I get all the time. The answer is surprisingly simple.
You just throw your test ad directly into your live broad ad set with 1-3 variations and let Meta figure it out:
If it's a winner, Meta will give it reach and spend
If it's a loser, it'll get barely any reach and just a few dollars in spend
After about 7 days, you'll know if it's working or not
That's it. No complicated test campaigns needed. Meta's algorithm is smart enough to identify winners without wasting your budget on losers.
Why This Works Better for Local Businesses
Local businesses actually benefit more from this simplified approach:
You're already targeting a limited area, so further audience segmentation often makes your audiences too small
Local customers typically share similar problems regardless of demographics
Local business budgets need to be super efficient - no room for wasted spend
You probably don't have time to manage complex campaign structures anyway
This aligns with Meta's recommendations in their Small Business Resources
The Bottom Line: Broader is Better
In 2025, the evidence is clear - broader, simplified Meta Ads account structures deliver better results for local business lead generation.
The key is to:
Trust Meta's AI to find your customers
Use one campaign with broad targeting
Focus on creating lots of good ad variations
Test new ideas within your existing structure
Be patient and let the system learn
Our agency has seen this work across dozens of local businesses. The old way of micromanaging campaigns is dead. Embrace the algorithm, and your local lead gen results will thank you.
Have you tried simplifying your Meta Ads structure? Let me know in the comments.
The "Micromanager" Account Structure Breakdown

So what does a micromanager account structure actually look like?
Typically, you'd see:
Separate campaigns for awareness, consideration, and conversion
Multiple ad sets divided by audience types
Different ad sets for retargeting, lookalikes, and cold traffic
Location-specific ad sets within your service area
Separate budgets for each segment
Many advertisers still swear by this approach. They like seeing exactly which audiences perform best and being able to control everything manually.
But here's the problem - this approach made sense in 2020, not in 2025.
What Meta Actually Recommends

Meta has been pushing for simpler campaign structures through their Advantage+ campaigns and automated features.
Meta has been crystal clear about their direction in recent years. Their official guidance pushes for simpler structures that let their AI do the heavy lifting.
From Meta's ad set structure guide:
"When you run similar ad sets at the same time, each one gets fewer opportunities to learn, and fewer results. Combining ad sets will help you get the results you need faster, and see stable results sooner."
Meta specifically recommends:
Use fewer campaigns and ad sets: Consolidate to 1 campaign per objective with fewer ad sets
Broaden targeting: Remove unnecessary targeting restrictions to help the algorithm find the best audiences
Consolidate similar audiences: Stop splitting your budget across multiple similar audience segments
Meta has seen impressive results from businesses that implement simplified structures. According to Meta's Ad Set Structure Guide:
"Women's accessories brand Lele Sadoughi saw a +41% jump in conversions when they tested a simplified ad account structure."
This real-world example demonstrates exactly what my agency has been seeing with our local business clients - consolidation works.
As Meta puts it in their Business Help Center:
"Our ad delivery system works best when your audience size is between 2 to 10 million people. With a bigger audience, the auction will have greater opportunities to deliver ads, observe outcomes and optimize."
Basically, Meta is saying: "Trust our algorithm, it knows what it's doing."
What My Agency Found With Real Local Clients

We tested this ourselves with a hair restoration clinic in Scottsdale.
Our initial setup followed the traditional approach:
A retargeting ad set
A lookalike ad set
A prospecting ad set
Various test ad sets
This worked fine at first. But we kept hitting the same wall - retargeting and lookalike audiences would eventually fatigue, and performance would drop.
So we tried what Meta suggested, but took it even further:
One campaign
One broad ad set
About 50 diverse ads (not just the 3-6 Meta recommends)
The results? Way more stability, lower cost per lead, and ability to scale without performance tanking. Plus, we spent way less time managing campaigns and more time on creating better ads.
"But How Do You Test With Just One Campaign?"

This is the question I get all the time. The answer is surprisingly simple.
You just throw your test ad directly into your live broad ad set with 1-3 variations and let Meta figure it out:
If it's a winner, Meta will give it reach and spend
If it's a loser, it'll get barely any reach and just a few dollars in spend
After about 7 days, you'll know if it's working or not
That's it. No complicated test campaigns needed. Meta's algorithm is smart enough to identify winners without wasting your budget on losers.
Why This Works Better for Local Businesses
Local businesses actually benefit more from this simplified approach:
You're already targeting a limited area, so further audience segmentation often makes your audiences too small
Local customers typically share similar problems regardless of demographics
Local business budgets need to be super efficient - no room for wasted spend
You probably don't have time to manage complex campaign structures anyway
This aligns with Meta's recommendations in their Small Business Resources
The Bottom Line: Broader is Better
In 2025, the evidence is clear - broader, simplified Meta Ads account structures deliver better results for local business lead generation.
The key is to:
Trust Meta's AI to find your customers
Use one campaign with broad targeting
Focus on creating lots of good ad variations
Test new ideas within your existing structure
Be patient and let the system learn
Our agency has seen this work across dozens of local businesses. The old way of micromanaging campaigns is dead. Embrace the algorithm, and your local lead gen results will thank you.
Have you tried simplifying your Meta Ads structure? Let me know in the comments.
The "Micromanager" Account Structure Breakdown

So what does a micromanager account structure actually look like?
Typically, you'd see:
Separate campaigns for awareness, consideration, and conversion
Multiple ad sets divided by audience types
Different ad sets for retargeting, lookalikes, and cold traffic
Location-specific ad sets within your service area
Separate budgets for each segment
Many advertisers still swear by this approach. They like seeing exactly which audiences perform best and being able to control everything manually.
But here's the problem - this approach made sense in 2020, not in 2025.
What Meta Actually Recommends

Meta has been pushing for simpler campaign structures through their Advantage+ campaigns and automated features.
Meta has been crystal clear about their direction in recent years. Their official guidance pushes for simpler structures that let their AI do the heavy lifting.
From Meta's ad set structure guide:
"When you run similar ad sets at the same time, each one gets fewer opportunities to learn, and fewer results. Combining ad sets will help you get the results you need faster, and see stable results sooner."
Meta specifically recommends:
Use fewer campaigns and ad sets: Consolidate to 1 campaign per objective with fewer ad sets
Broaden targeting: Remove unnecessary targeting restrictions to help the algorithm find the best audiences
Consolidate similar audiences: Stop splitting your budget across multiple similar audience segments
Meta has seen impressive results from businesses that implement simplified structures. According to Meta's Ad Set Structure Guide:
"Women's accessories brand Lele Sadoughi saw a +41% jump in conversions when they tested a simplified ad account structure."
This real-world example demonstrates exactly what my agency has been seeing with our local business clients - consolidation works.
As Meta puts it in their Business Help Center:
"Our ad delivery system works best when your audience size is between 2 to 10 million people. With a bigger audience, the auction will have greater opportunities to deliver ads, observe outcomes and optimize."
Basically, Meta is saying: "Trust our algorithm, it knows what it's doing."
What My Agency Found With Real Local Clients

We tested this ourselves with a hair restoration clinic in Scottsdale.
Our initial setup followed the traditional approach:
A retargeting ad set
A lookalike ad set
A prospecting ad set
Various test ad sets
This worked fine at first. But we kept hitting the same wall - retargeting and lookalike audiences would eventually fatigue, and performance would drop.
So we tried what Meta suggested, but took it even further:
One campaign
One broad ad set
About 50 diverse ads (not just the 3-6 Meta recommends)
The results? Way more stability, lower cost per lead, and ability to scale without performance tanking. Plus, we spent way less time managing campaigns and more time on creating better ads.
"But How Do You Test With Just One Campaign?"

This is the question I get all the time. The answer is surprisingly simple.
You just throw your test ad directly into your live broad ad set with 1-3 variations and let Meta figure it out:
If it's a winner, Meta will give it reach and spend
If it's a loser, it'll get barely any reach and just a few dollars in spend
After about 7 days, you'll know if it's working or not
That's it. No complicated test campaigns needed. Meta's algorithm is smart enough to identify winners without wasting your budget on losers.
Why This Works Better for Local Businesses
Local businesses actually benefit more from this simplified approach:
You're already targeting a limited area, so further audience segmentation often makes your audiences too small
Local customers typically share similar problems regardless of demographics
Local business budgets need to be super efficient - no room for wasted spend
You probably don't have time to manage complex campaign structures anyway
This aligns with Meta's recommendations in their Small Business Resources
The Bottom Line: Broader is Better
In 2025, the evidence is clear - broader, simplified Meta Ads account structures deliver better results for local business lead generation.
The key is to:
Trust Meta's AI to find your customers
Use one campaign with broad targeting
Focus on creating lots of good ad variations
Test new ideas within your existing structure
Be patient and let the system learn
Our agency has seen this work across dozens of local businesses. The old way of micromanaging campaigns is dead. Embrace the algorithm, and your local lead gen results will thank you.
Have you tried simplifying your Meta Ads structure? Let me know in the comments.
Ready to scale your brand to new heights?
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with increased sales and profitability with paid ads, then you're in the right place.
Ready to scale your brand to new heights?
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with increased sales and profitability with paid ads, then you're in the right place.
Ready to scale your brand to new heights?
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with increased sales and profitability with paid ads, then you're in the right place.
Ready to scale your brand to new heights?
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with increased sales and profitability with paid ads, then you're in the right place.